Foucault Kindle ↠ Paperback

Foucault [Reading] ➯ Foucault ➷ José Guilherme Merquior – Thomashillier.co.uk Encompassing all of Foucault's published work this book provides an array of secondary literature about Foucault including his philosophical history his debts to other thinkers and his complex relatio Encompassing all of Foucault's published work this book provides an array of secondary literature about Foucault including his philosophical history his debts to other thinkers and his complex relationship to French structuralism This book raises important ueries as to the ultimate value and legitimacy of his variety of philosophical rhetoric with its attendant view of the role of the modern intellectual.


10 thoughts on “Foucault

  1. Ahmad Sharabiani Ahmad Sharabiani says:

    ‭‭‭‭Foucault c1985 Jose Guilherme Meruior 1941 1991Foucault 1985; second edition 1991 is a book about the French intellectual Michel Foucault by the Brazilian critic and sociologist José Guilherme Meruior in which the author provides a critical evaluation of Foucault including works such as Madness and Civilization 1961 and The History of Sexuality 1976 Foucault received praise from several scholars but has also been criticized The book is part of the Fontana Modern Masters seriesتاریخ نخستین خوانش بیست و پنجم ماه آگوست سال 2011 میلادیعنوان میشل فوکو، یا، نیست انگاری ادبیات روشنفکری؛ اثر ژوزه گیلرم مرکیور؛ ترجمه الله شکر اسداللهی تجرق؛ مشخصات نشر تبریز، موسسه تحقیقاتی علوم اسلامی انسانی دانشگاه تبریز، 1385، در 242 ص، شابک 9789647589734؛ همین کتاب با عنوان «فوکو» و ترجمه ی بانو نازی عظیما توسط نشر کارنامه در 304 ص منتشر شده، کتابنامه از ص 229 تا 242 و به صورت زیرنویسا شربیانی


  2. Panos Panos says:

    Πολύ καλό τεκμηριωμένο και αμείλικτο σε ότι αφορά την κριτική του στις ανεπάρκειες και στρεβλώσεις της φουκοϊκής σκέψης


  3. Michael Michael says:

    120714 now this is like what i expected written in foucault's era just after his death so early work lived assessment caricatures in beginning have a hard time reading this without thinking of the other foucault especially may perhaps would have been better to read this first but then i might not have been interested in critical in tone as much as content wonder why the author wrote this he might be an 'analytic' sort of phil certainly not sympathetic with f's reasoning f's sources f's techniues this makes me wonder why i have no trouble reading of this a lot of trouble reading wittgenstein f has provocative ideas rather inexact histories elaborate and extreme ideas of how institutions practices ways of thought shift from one unconscious characterization of the real to the next but what exercises the author seems to be that f writes well and does not lay out his arguments definitions histories in any sort of linear pattern with any clear causal relationships he writes well he seduces by rhetoric he follows one vague overarching scheme 'archaeology' 'genealogy' from one concern to the next even from the little read of his life can see where meruior is mistaken even from the little read describing f's selective tendency with history get the sense meruior is mistaken i am not a professional i am not looking for some valid way of living in the universe i do not think i am target demographic for this i did enjoy reading it however in error it seems sometimes as in may's book as in the background here i enjoy the stimulus the thoughts but no real interest in defending it i leave that to the 30 years of others since his deathonly reason it is on brazillit written by a Brazilian diplomat


  4. Corey Kellicut Corey Kellicut says:

    Meruior sums up most of his views on p 144First his history as I daresay has been abundantly demonstrated throughout this book is far from being always sound No doubt it often opens up new perspectives and has thereby heuristic virtues But its conceptual muddles and explanatory weaknesses and mark it is always an argumentative history an histoire à thèse than outweigh its real contributions Foucault's historical evidence is too selective and distorted his interpretations too sweeping and too biased Thus in the end far from counting by itself as research or insight his history stand or falls with his Weltanschauung and therefore falls


  5. Amani Marshall Amani Marshall says:

    follow Foucault and u get nihilism and delusional contempt for society


  6. Zoonanism Zoonanism says:

    Excellent this fontana modern masters book alongside the one by Steiner on Heidegger and Leech's review of Levi Strauss must be of the best in the series So concise yet unforgiving of Foucault's many flaws and pretenses


  7. Teodor Rørbech Teodor Rørbech says:

    A critical analysis of Foucaults weaknesses and irrelevance in academia


  8. David Walters David Walters says:

    Foucault first published in 1985 is a short critical examination of the work of the French philosopher Michel Foucault Written by José Guilherme Meruior it is a wonderfully well written book and can be recommended to anyone looking for an introduction to Foucault


  9. khers khers says:

    کتابی بسیار خواندنی با ترجمه زیبای نازی عظیما


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *